Ct dating expectation great in
Pursuant to Dating Services Law section 394(c)(9)(b) the Court awarded each plaintiff their “actual damages,” which the Court interpreted as “the difference between each contract price and the fee which is the maximum fee permitted under the Dating Services Law for their contracts.” Finally, the Court awarded each plaintiff a return of the defendant was permitted to charge, on the grounds “that each claimant would not have signed a contract containing terms violating applicable law had she known of her rights.” Such an award thus achieves “substantial justice” in accordance with N. Ansonia High School is a Grade 9-12 school serving approximately 625 students.
Where, as here, the dating service does not assure it will furnish a client with a specified number of social referrals per month, the service may charge no more than twenty five dollars (G. The subject dating service contracts assured that there would be no referrals and, even as the oral assurances given to claimant Roe of twelve introductions to be provided over the course of 36 months, failed to commit to any number of introductions in any given month.
While the standards set grade-specific goals, they do not define how the standards should be taught or which materials should be used to support students.
States and districts recognize that there will need to be a range of supports in place to ensure that all students, including those with special needs and English language learners, can master the standards.
Online Dating Service Subject To New York Dating Services Law Court finds that the defendant Internet dating service Great Expectations, also known as GE Management Group of N.
Unauthorized internet reseller of plaintiffs products is not guilty of trademark infringement, and does not cause actionable initial interest confusion, by using plaintiffs trademarks in meta tags of website at which plaintiffs and its competitors products are sold, and in...